Next message: Donovan, Harold: "RE: [WinMac] Canon printer preferences file error/freezing on iMa c"
I have several Macs, iMacs, G4, etc on a network. All
can access and print with the HP 4100N via the ethernet hub
when I hard wire them. When I switch to
using Airport, all the computers see each other
but I can't get the dad burn HP to print via airport.
I've tried connecting the HP via the hub, directly to
Airport station and a variety of combinations with
no success.
I plan on moving entire classroom to wireless as soon as
I work thru the printer problems. Any hints or help out
there?
Dennis Devine
San Antonio Boys Village.
At 06:40 PM 8/22/2001 +0000, you wrote:
>winmac Digest 22 Aug 2001 18:40:56 -0000 Issue 118
>
>Topics (messages 548 through 559):
>
>Re: Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
> 548 by: Perbix, Michael
> 550 by: Curtis Wilcox
> 551 by: Darryl Lee
> 553 by: Curtis Wilcox
> 554 by: Tim Scoff
> 555 by: Darryl Lee
> 556 by: Bruce Johnson
> 559 by: hharken
>
>Re: winmac Digest 21 Aug 2001 15:04:46 -0000 Issue 117
> 549 by: Aryeh Weinstein
>
>Re: Cisco Aeronet and Apple Airport
> 552 by: KRushing
>
>Outlook 2001 questions
> 557 by: Jerry Smith
>
>Shared printers.
> 558 by: Robert Runte
>
>Administrivia:
>
>To unsubscribe from the digest, send mail to
>winmac-digest-unsubscribe@iffy.com
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Message-ID: <F76673F32B494E4D9285D1DD1FD6B6D1044449@lmms.lmsd.org>
>From: "Perbix, Michael" <PERBIX@lmsd.org>
>To: "'winmac@iffy.com'" <winmac@iffy.com>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:40:59 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain
>Subject: RE: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>There is no Problem using the Cisco product with Airport, we use it here,
>however you must be careful with the password if you are using the
>encryption.
>
>What you need to do is to set up a base station with an English password
>save the changes, then go to the menu that shows the PC equiv. password.
>This is a Hex password that you can then use in the Cisco setup. For the
>Macs you use the English word that you entered originally, and the PC's use
>the equiv.
>
> -Mike
>
> > -------------------------------------
> > Michael Perbix
> > Telecommunications Specialist
> > Lower Merion School District
> > (610) 645-1964 - Phone
> > (610) 896-8224 - Fax
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: KRushing [SMTP:krushing@cecasun.utc.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:04 AM
> > To: winmac@iffy.com
> > Subject: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
> >
> > From: Kit <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > UT Chattanooga is installing a Sysco Wireless Aeronet system in the
> > university library. Long range plans call for the system to be
> > expanded from the library to other buildings on campus.
> >
> > The two wireless systems, Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport, seem to be
> > incompatible.
> >
> > Our Macintosh computers with airport cards installed can see the
> > Sysco system. The Sysco system sees the airport card. However, only
> > limited communication between the two systems seems to be possible.
> > Airport card equipped Macs working through the Sysco wireless base
> > stations are able to access some parts of the World-Wide-Web via html
> > and browsers - however, the communication between the two
> > technologies is very limited and the transfer of e-mail and some
> > other complex web communications simply do not exist between Airport
> > and Aeronet.
> >
> > After trying unsuccessfully several settings configurations within
> > the Sysco wireless base stations, the UTC technical folk on campus
> > are now saying that if Mac users wish to have wiresless access in the
> > library (and, I suppose, in the expanded wireless system proposed for
> > the future), the Mac users will either have to convert to Windows
> > operating system laptops with Sysco Aeronet cards installed or the
> > Mac users will have to replace their Apple internal airport cards
> > with PCMIA Aeronet cards.
> >
> > My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list
> > have experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet
> > wireless with Apple Airport?
> >
> > (As an aside, one of our support people told me today that in his
> > opinion, "Lucent is going belly-up anyway, so Apple is going to have
> > to find another supplier for its Airport cards." I'm not sure what
> > that means for my problem, but it was an interesting observation,
> > nonetheless.)
> >
> > --kit
> >
> > --
> > ____________________________________________________
> > ....................................................
> >
> >
> > *** Windows-MacintoshOS Cooperation List ***
> > FAQ: http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/
> > Archive: http://www.darryl.com/winmac/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send mail to winmac-unsubscribe@iffy.com
>Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010821122530.00aed408@mail.rochester.edu>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:05:50 -0400
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>From: Curtis Wilcox <cwcx@mail.rochester.edu>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>At 11:04 AM 8/21/2001 -0400, KRushing wrote:
>>From: Kit <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
>>----------------------------
>>
>>UT Chattanooga is installing a Sysco Wireless Aeronet system in the
>>university library. Long range plans call for the system to be expanded
>>from the library to other buildings on campus.
>>
>>The two wireless systems, Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport, seem to be
>>incompatible.
>>
>>Our Macintosh computers with airport cards installed can see the Sysco
>>system. The Sysco system sees the airport card. However, only limited
>>communication between the two systems seems to be possible. Airport card
>>equipped Macs working through the Sysco wireless base stations are able
>>to access some parts of the World-Wide-Web via html and browsers -
>>however, the communication between the two technologies is very limited
>>and the transfer of e-mail and some other complex web communications
>>simply do not exist between Airport and Aeronet.
>
>Can you elaborate on what does and does not work from Macs using AirPort
>cards? Can you get to web pages hosted in the library? Hosted elsewhere on
>campus? Hosted outside the campus? Make sure you can get to the same pages
>from a wireless PC and from the same Mac using a wired connection. Choose
>test pages which people might actually use like Yahoo! or cnn.com. Test
>the other supported Internet tasks, such as using SSH or a POP client,
>also testing these from a wireless PC
>
>If you can "access some parts of the World-Wide-Web" from an AirPort
>equipped Mac, I suspect the problem is not with communication between the
>AirPort card and Cisco access point. 802.11b networking is a lot like
>wired Ethernet networking, problems at that layer are usually all or
>nothing (except when signal strength is poor).
>
>Other points which could be a source of problems are a DHCP server,
>Network Address Translation (NAT) server, or a proxy server.
>
>>After trying unsuccessfully several settings configurations within the
>>Sysco wireless base stations, the UTC technical folk on campus are now
>>saying that if Mac users wish to have wiresless access in the library
>>(and, I suppose, in the expanded wireless system proposed for the
>>future), the Mac users will either have to convert to Windows operating
>>system laptops with Sysco Aeronet cards installed or the Mac users will
>>have to replace their Apple internal airport cards with PCMIA Aeronet cards.
>
>Are they also requiring all PC clients to use only Cisco cards or are they
>being hypocritical?
>
>>My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list have
>>experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet wireless with
>>Apple Airport?
>>
>>(As an aside, one of our support people told me today that in his
>>opinion, "Lucent is going belly-up anyway, so Apple is going to have to
>>find another supplier for its Airport cards." I'm not sure what that
>>means for my problem, but it was an interesting observation, nonetheless.)
>
>Lucent's wireless tech is spinning off as Agere Systems so they should not
>be encumbered by Lucent's problems.
><http://www.lucent.com/micro/companyoverview.html>
>
>
>--
>Curtis Wilcox cwcx@mail.rochester.edu
>Desktop Systems Consultant 716/274-1160
>Eastman School of Music Pager: x12-3290
>
>
>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:41:27 -0700
>From: Darryl Lee <lee@darryl.com>
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>Message-ID: <20010821104127.B12396@shell3.ba.best.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
> > My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list
> > have experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet
> > wireless with Apple Airport?
>
>Hi Kit. First of all, let's be clear here. You're talking about
>Cisco Aironet, right? Because Sysco is a company that makes cafeteria
>supplies. (And whose stock is *far* less volatile than that of the
>network equipment manufacturer. :)
>
>Anyways, found an article that discusses the proprietary system that
>Cisco uses for security in its 350 models:
>
>http://www.networkcomputing.com/1203/1203sp1.html
>
>Basically, it rotates WEP keys, and generates them more securely.
>
>And here's Cisco's "response to researchers" which spins their
>incompatible system as a security "feature":
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/ao350ap/prodlit/1281_pp.htm
>
>As i recall, the 340 series of Cisco access points had an 802.11b
>compatibility mode that could be turned on. i imagine that the newer
>access points should also be able to use this feature to make them
>work with AirPort and other non-Cisco cards.
>
>But they'll probably tell you that they don't want to run in
>compatible mode because they want to use Cisco's proprietary security.
>Oh well, at least the Cisco cards have Mac drivers. That's more than
>you can say for most of the other 802.11b cards out there.
>
>Annoyingly, this means that everybody will have to buy Cisco cards,
>which cost 2-3 times more than any of the other cards out there. But
>hey, you're at a University, so you probably get 'em for cheap.
>
>But it also means that any visiting researchers will have to buy or
>borrow a card, even if they already have an 802.11b card. Basically,
>administrators are locking themselves into buying from *one* vendor.
>The idea of standards is that it promotes competition, and you get
>better quality and at lower prices.
>
>But oh well. Security *is* an issue, since standard WEP can be broken
>so easily (see http://airsnort.sourceforge.net), but it can be dealt
>with by using standard VPN clients on top of a WEP-less network.
>
>--
>Darryl Lee <lee@darryl.com> | Bore yourself silly: <http://www.darryl.com>
>Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010821135130.00b14158@mail.rochester.edu>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:12:23 -0400
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>From: Curtis Wilcox <cwcx@mail.rochester.edu>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>At 10:41 AM 8/21/2001 -0700, Darryl Lee wrote:
>> > My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list
>> > have experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet
>> > wireless with Apple Airport?
>>
>>Hi Kit. First of all, let's be clear here. You're talking about
>>Cisco Aironet, right? Because Sysco is a company that makes cafeteria
>>supplies. (And whose stock is *far* less volatile than that of the
>>network equipment manufacturer. :)
>>
>>Anyways, found an article that discusses the proprietary system that
>>Cisco uses for security in its 350 models:
>>
>>http://www.networkcomputing.com/1203/1203sp1.html
>>
>>Basically, it rotates WEP keys, and generates them more securely.
>>
>>And here's Cisco's "response to researchers" which spins their
>>incompatible system as a security "feature":
>>
>>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/ao350ap/prodlit/1281_pp.htm
>>
>>As i recall, the 340 series of Cisco access points had an 802.11b
>>compatibility mode that could be turned on. i imagine that the newer
>>access points should also be able to use this feature to make them
>>work with AirPort and other non-Cisco cards.
>
>Thanks for the good links Darryl. I had thought about the proprietary
>security thing but since Kit seemed to be saying they could access *some*
>things on the 'net I assumed that couldn't be a problem.
>
>>But they'll probably tell you that they don't want to run in
>>compatible mode because they want to use Cisco's proprietary security.
>>Oh well, at least the Cisco cards have Mac drivers. That's more than
>>you can say for most of the other 802.11b cards out there.
>
>But anyone with an iBook will be SOL because the iBook doesn't have a PC
>Card slot and Cisco doesn't seem to sell a USB version of their client adapter.
>
>
>--
>Curtis Wilcox cwcx@mail.rochester.edu
>Desktop Systems Consultant 716/274-1160
>Eastman School of Music Pager: x12-3290
>
>
>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Message-Id: <p05100303b7a86f239fa3@[192.168.1.11]>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:05:44 -0400
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>From: Tim Scoff <tim@scoff.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
> I suspect that the problem is the Apple Airport cards only
> support 40 bit encryption. They probably have their network configured
> to require 128 bit encryption.
>
> I heard a rumor that Apple is releasing a 128 bit version of the
> card in the near future. Supposedly it has already shipped.
>
>At 11:04 AM -0400 8/21/01, KRushing wrote:
>>From: Kit <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
>>----------------------------
>>
>>UT Chattanooga is installing a Sysco Wireless Aeronet system in the
>>university library. Long range plans call for the system to be expanded
>>from the library to other buildings on campus.
>>
>>The two wireless systems, Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport, seem to be
>>incompatible.
>>
>>Our Macintosh computers with airport cards installed can see the Sysco
>>system. The Sysco system sees the airport card. However, only limited
>>communication between the two systems seems to be possible. Airport card
>>equipped Macs working through the Sysco wireless base stations are able
>>to access some parts of the World-Wide-Web via html and browsers -
>>however, the communication between the two technologies is very limited
>>and the transfer of e-mail and some other complex web communications
>>simply do not exist between Airport and Aeronet.
>>
>>After trying unsuccessfully several settings configurations within the
>>Sysco wireless base stations, the UTC technical folk on campus are now
>>saying that if Mac users wish to have wiresless access in the library
>>(and, I suppose, in the expanded wireless system proposed for the
>>future), the Mac users will either have to convert to Windows operating
>>system laptops with Sysco Aeronet cards installed or the Mac users will
>>have to replace their Apple internal airport cards with PCMIA Aeronet cards.
>>
>>My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list have
>>experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet wireless with
>>Apple Airport?
>>
>>(As an aside, one of our support people told me today that in his
>>opinion, "Lucent is going belly-up anyway, so Apple is going to have to
>>find another supplier for its Airport cards." I'm not sure what that
>>means for my problem, but it was an interesting observation, nonetheless.)
>>
>>--kit
>>
>>--
>>____________________________________________________
>>....................................................
>>
>>*** Windows-MacintoshOS Cooperation List ***
>>FAQ: http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/
>>Archive: http://www.darryl.com/winmac/
>>
>>To unsubscribe, send mail to winmac-unsubscribe@iffy.com
>
>
>--
>
>
>Tim Scoff AST, MCSE
>tim@scoff.net
>http://www.scoff.net/
>(412) 422-5242
>Pager - (412) 602-7738
>
>"You can't help getting older, but you don't have to get old."
> - George Burns
>
>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:48:38 -0700
>From: Darryl Lee <lee@darryl.com>
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>Message-ID: <20010821134838.B27292@shell3.ba.best.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 04:05:44PM -0400, Tim Scoff wrote:
> > I suspect that the problem is the Apple Airport cards only
> > support 40 bit encryption. They probably have their network
> > configured to require 128 bit encryption.
> >
> > I heard a rumor that Apple is releasing a 128 bit version of
> > the card in the near future. Supposedly it has already shipped.
>
>Yeah, bit-length could be a problem too, but i think they're probably
>using the proprietary Cisco security stuff.
>
>Of course bit-length hardly matters, now that Airsnort is out:
>
>http://airsnort.sourceforge.net/
>
>i'm running it right now, but since our wireless network is relatively
>un-busy, it'll probably be a few days before i have enough packets to
>crack the WEP key.
>
>Check out: http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,46187,00.html
>
>That's right - anybody with a laptop, Linux, and a Linksys card (and
>others will work as well), can crack into your WEP-secured wireless
>LAN. Hrm, maybe the Cisco stuff is worth 2-3 times as much. OR,
>maybe you should invest in VPN technology (which maybe you already
>have in place), and use that for your secuirity, instead of WEP.
>
>--Darryl
>Message-ID: <3B82E3E5.3090004@pharmacy.arizona.edu>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:42:45 -0700
>From: Bruce Johnson <johnson@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>Darryl Lee wrote:
>
>>That's right - anybody with a laptop, Linux, and a Linksys card (and
>>others will work as well), can crack into your WEP-secured wireless
>>LAN. Hrm, maybe the Cisco stuff is worth 2-3 times as much. OR,
>>maybe you should invest in VPN technology (which maybe you already
>>have in place), and use that for your secuirity, instead of WEP.
>
>Is there a VPN technology out there that:
>
>a) Runs on a Mac
>b) Runs on Windows 98/Me/2K
>c) Runs on Linux
>d) Runs slightly faster than copying everything to a zip disk and
>bicycling it to the other system
>e) doesn't cost an arm, a leg, a half-pound of liver and a kidney?
>
>So far I can find 'Choose any two'...
>
>You know...if we treated house security like we're expected to treat
>computer security, everyone would need 65-ton armor steel CBN resistant
>time-locked vault doors on our houses keyed to our own specific DNA
>sequences, passwords updated every other Tuesday...seems much simpler to
>horsewhip the crackers when we catch 'em breaking in.
>
>What we need are the electronic equivalents of my dogs..I hardly ever lock
>my doors at home.
>
>Don't need to, I have 120 aggregate pounds of carnivore with sharp teeth
>and loud voices hanging out behind the doors.
>--
>Bruce Johnson
>University of Arizona
>College of Pharmacy
>Information Technology Group
>
>
>
>Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:55:43 -0800
>From: hharken <hank.harken@asu.edu>
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>Message-id: <200108221840.LAA21123@smtp.asu.edu>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
> >UT Chattanooga is installing a Sysco Wireless Aeronet system in the
> >university library. Long range plans call for the system to be
> >expanded from the library to other buildings on campus.
> >
> >The two wireless systems, Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport, seem
> > to be incompatible.
>
>It would be interesting to know what standard Sysco (Cisco?)
>uses. The Apple/Lucent components are supposed to be fully
>802.11b standard compliant and both companies belong to
>the standard organization that is promoting wireless
>"Ethernet" compatibility.
>
>If your campus is installing something that does not correspond
>to 802.11b but some proprietary wireless communication method,
>there could be a whole future of problems at UT-Chattanooga.
>Even if Lucent goes belly-up, Apple can easily find another
>supplier since the AirPort cards are completely 802.11b standard.
>The same may not be true for the Aeronet product.
>
>I don't have a solution for you. It just sounds to me as
>if whoever is doing this wireless installation is/are
>exercising poor judgment, has not fully tested the wireless
>product market and standards, and is certainly not being
>a customer service organization. (Why do IT departments
>decide what is good for the customers ? We certainly don't
>accept that from any commercial service providers).
>
>- Hank
>- Hank
>Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010821123902.02769b58@inet2000.i-netconsulting.com>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:45:35 -0400
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>From: Aryeh Weinstein <ari@i-netconsulting.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>Subject: Re: winmac Digest 21 Aug 2001 15:04:46 -0000 Issue 117
>
>
>>Kit-
>
>I have made the Apple Airport cards work with Lucent Orinoco Access Points
>and Residential Gateways, it is confusing, but possible. I had to contact
>Lucent tech support and get some documentation from them. The Apple cards
>are standard 802.11 cards, but the software that Apple provides for
>configuring the cards doesn't use standard 802.11 terminology for
>describing the different settings. I know that this isn't a lot of help,
>but I could probably make it work if I had the Cisco access point and a
>Powerbook with an AirPort card in front of me. The Cisco cards are Mac
>compatible, however, and Cisco's roaming capabilities (moving from access
>point to access point) are excellent in an enterprise environment.
>
>-Ari Weinstein
>
>>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:04:14 -0400
>>To: winmac@iffy.com
>>From: KRushing <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>>Subject: Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>>
>>From: Kit <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
>>----------------------------
>>
>>UT Chattanooga is installing a Sysco Wireless Aeronet system in the
>>university library. Long range plans call for the system to be expanded
>>from the library to other buildings on campus.
>>
>>The two wireless systems, Sysco Aeronet and Apple Airport, seem to be
>>incompatible.
>>
>>Our Macintosh computers with airport cards installed can see the Sysco
>>system. The Sysco system sees the airport card. However, only limited
>>communication between the two systems seems to be possible. Airport card
>>equipped Macs working through the Sysco wireless base stations are able
>>to access some parts of the World-Wide-Web via html and browsers -
>>however, the communication between the two technologies is very limited
>>and the transfer of e-mail and some other complex web communications
>>simply do not exist between Airport and Aeronet.
>>
>>After trying unsuccessfully several settings configurations within the
>>Sysco wireless base stations, the UTC technical folk on campus are now
>>saying that if Mac users wish to have wiresless access in the library
>>(and, I suppose, in the expanded wireless system proposed for the
>>future), the Mac users will either have to convert to Windows operating
>>system laptops with Sysco Aeronet cards installed or the Mac users will
>>have to replace their Apple internal airport cards with PCMIA Aeronet cards.
>>
>>My question to the Win-Mac list is this: does anyone on the list have
>>experience with attempting to make compatible Sysco Aeronet wireless with
>>Apple Airport?
>>
>>(As an aside, one of our support people told me today that in his
>>opinion, "Lucent is going belly-up anyway, so Apple is going to have to
>>find another supplier for its Airport cards." I'm not sure what that
>>means for my problem, but it was an interesting observation, nonetheless.)
>>
>>--kit
>
>
>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Message-Id: <p05100315b7a8531d1a36@[10.0.1.12]>
>Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:07:36 -0400
>To: winmac@iffy.com
>From: KRushing <krushing@cecasun.utc.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] Cisco Aeronet and Apple Airport
>
>>
>>Hi Kit. First of all, let's be clear here. You're talking about
>>Cisco Aironet, right? Because Sysco is a company that makes cafeteria
>>supplies. (And whose stock is *far* less volatile than that of the
>>network equipment manufacturer. :)
>-------
>
>Darryl,
>
>You are, of course, absolutely on target... I am trying to describe the
>Cisco... not the Sysco...
>
>-----
>The responses that are coming from our colleagues about this perplexing
>issue are, to me, represent the value of this mail list. Each response is
>very helpful... and, for whatever it may be worth, I appreciate members
>of the the list taking a few moments to share with the list expertise and
>experience.
>
>--kit
>
>
>--
>____________________________________________________
>....................................................
>
>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Message-Id: <v0421010db7a923adc027@[10.0.1.3]>
>Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:15:02 +1000
>To: The Windows-MacOS cooperation list <winmac@iffy.com>
>From: Jerry Smith <spn0014@mail.saipan.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>Subject: Outlook 2001 questions
>
>I am using Outlook 2001 (Mac) at work and have two questions.
>
>1. Since switching to the new version (from Outlook 8.2), my email
>functions fine except that every time I open a mailbox (Inbox, Sent Items,
>etc.) I always get a message that says "The set of folders could not be
>opened. The client operation failed." Despite the message, I have access
>to my mail. Could this message be because our campus Exchange server might
>not be up to date for some of the functions of the new Outlook 2001 client?
>
>2. How can I configure Outlook to display HTML email? When someone sends
>HTML formatted email all I see is plain text with all the tags. Haven't
>been able to find a setting for this anywhere in Outlook.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jerry Smith
>_____________
>Jerry Smith
>Northern Marianas College
>Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands
>jerrys@saipan.com
>
>
>Message-ID: <3B83B553.E11AD278@aea7.k12.ia.us>
>Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:36:19 -0500
>From: Robert Runte <brunte@aea7.k12.ia.us>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: "winmac@iffy.com" <winmac@iffy.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Subject: Shared printers.
>
>Hi.
>
>I have two PCs on a network consisting primarily of Macs. One PC, a
>Win95 machine in connected to a printer. I share that printer out and
>the other PC, a Win98 machine can see it and print to it. Both PCs shut
>off for the night. The next morning the Win98 PC can't print to the
>printer. It gives a message about the print queue being full. I have to
>delete the printer and re-add it to get it to work for the day. Any
>suggestions? I've looked in Microsoft's Knowledge base, but haven't
>found anything relating to this.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bob
>--
>Robert L. Runte Programmer/Analyst
>MCSE MCP + Internet
>Tel: 319-273-8212 Fax: 319-273-8243
>E-mail: mailto:brunte@aea7.k12.ia.us
>Web Site: http://aea7.k12.ia.us
>Swap Shop: http://swapshop.aea7.k12.ia.us
>
>Regular naps prevent old age.....especially if you take them while
>driving.
*** Windows-MacintoshOS Cooperation List ***
FAQ: http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/
Archive: http://www.darryl.com/winmac/
To unsubscribe, send mail to winmac-unsubscribe@iffy.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 16:21:34 PDT