Re: [WinMac] NAT (IP Masq) vs. Proxy

Michael bartosh(bartosh[at]tamu.edu)
Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:01:01 -0600

> Not to belabor the point, but i found a couple of nice tables
> comparing NAT and Proxy solutions to sharing a connection.
> (Now granted, they're really kind of "selling" NAT, but still,
> they make some good points.)
>
> http://www.sygate.com/products.html
> http://www.vicomsoft.com/solutions/proxytable.html
>
> And to re-iterate, the big players in the NAT field are:
>
> SyGate (Windows): http://www.sygate.com/
> Vicom Internet Gateway (Mac): http://www.vicomsoft.com/
> IPNetRouter (Mac): http://www.sustworks.com/
> IP Masquerading (Linux): http://ipmasq.cjb.net/

Don't forget IP-NAT in NetBSD. It's a lot more straightforward than
in linux, and it'll work great on any old IIxx - Quadra you have
laying around.

-mab

*******
Michael Bartosh
bartosh@tamu.edu
cell: 409/537.2129
Texas A&M University
http://jungfrau.tamu.edu/~bartosh

"The first coding I ever did for NeXTSTEP was on an 040 cube at
Microsoft in the Cairo "idea room". We had a bunch of interesting
machines and OS's in there to steal ideas from."

-Greg Titus
Omni Development Inc.

* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Thu Feb 18 1999 - 16:07:35 PST