Re: [WinMac] NAT (IP Masq) vs. Proxy

Darryl Lee(lee[at]darryl.com)
Thu, 18 Feb 1999 16:53:24 -0800 (PST)

Michael wrote:
> Don't forget IP-NAT in NetBSD. It's a lot more straightforward than
> in linux, and it'll work great on any old IIxx - Quadra you have
> laying around.

Ah good one. Do you have a URL?

Unfortunately, i don't think it'll work for Victor, who wrote:
> 3. On which platform, Mac or Wintel, is the software easier to set up? One
> caveat: WindowsNT is out (too complex and new for me) and all the Unix
> flavors are out as well (it's been too long since I've done anything but type
> an ls command in Unix). For other reasons, the variations of AppleShare are
> out as well (will need a new Mac, which the president of the company
> will not purchase).

Oh, c'mon Victor, Unix isn't _that_ hard. (Wasn't there a talking
Barbie doll that exclaimed, "Unix is hard!"? :)

Actually i'm lying. Getting IP Masq to work under Linux is quite a
chore. Heck, just getting Linux up and running can be a chore. And i
_like_ that kind of thing.

-- 
Darryl Lee <lee@darryl.com> | Geek? Who me? <http://www.darryl.com>


*                    Windows-MacOS Cooperation List                 *

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Thu Feb 18 1999 - 16:57:42 PST