Re: [WinMac] Re: Office version terminology question
jeff thorstad(thorstadj[at]macconnect.com)
>>This was the problem with Office 95. It didn't upgrade enough to make it >>a real 32bit set of programs. The file naming WAS still 8.3, along with >>other mistakes. One of the stupidest things Microsoft ever did was >>"kinda" upgrading Office. > >There must be something wrong with your computers. Every installation of >Office 95 I've seen uses long file names and lets you do file management in >the Open dialog. Could it be that these systems were enforcing 8.3 to >maintain compatibility with NT 3.x or Novell servers, or even (gasp!) >versions of MacOS that hadn't heard about long WinDOS names?
Actually, we were trying to keep compatibility with floppy disks and
>As for stupid: the high degree of compatibility between Office 4.x and
Paying for this is stupid. Claiming this is NEW software is stupid. And
Actually, my favorite new feature WAS the auto-spellchecking. So I have
Jeff T
* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Wed Sep 02 1998 - 07:50:50 PDT |