Re: [WinMac] Palatino font for Windows 3.1/95/NT
Leonard Rosenthol(leonardr[at]Adobe.COM)
Fri, 21 Aug 1998 07:16:06 -0400
At 11:52 AM +0200 8/21/98, Jeroen Camstra wrote:
>- Why use the postscript fonts & ATM, why not just use a TrueType font and
>no extra software?
>
Many "serious" graphics folk find Postscript fonts to be superior
than TrueType fonts.
>- One of our printers is a non-postscript printer; will a postscript font
>(with ATM) work on this and will it look the same as the others?
>
Yes, because ATM will render the PS font for you to the non-PS
printer, just as it does to your screen.
>- Do the postscript/ATM and the TrueType Palatino fonts on the Mac look
>(very) different, or are they the same?
>
They're basically the same.
Leonard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol <mailto:leonardr@adobe.com>
Designated Free Electron (612) 766-4718 (Minn)
Adobe Systems Incorporated (215) 233-5270 (Philly)
PGP Fingerprint: 8CC9 8878 921E C627 0BC1 15BB FC19 64A9 0016 1397
* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
* FAQ: <http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/> *
* Archives: <http://www.darryl.com/winmac/> *
* Subscribe: <mailto:winmac-on@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Subscribe Digest: <mailto:winmac-digest@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Unsubscribe: <mailto:winmac-off@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2
on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 04:25:40 PDT
|