RE: [WinMac] ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup
From: Dan Schwartz (Expresso@snip.net)
Date: Thu Mar 08 2001 - 10:53:46 PST
Dear Tom,
I read through your compilation you posted 20 minutes later, and I'd suggest
trying UltraBac before taking the plunge into buying NT/2000 backup software.
ArcServe sucks; and Backup Exec is even worse.
You can download a 30 day time-bomb version at:
<http://www.ultrabac.com>. By the way, for personal use, it's free. Also, the
time bomb only applies to backing up: Restores are NEVER time-bombed.
Cheers!
Dan
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Roth [mailto:tomroth@wfubmc.edu]
>Subject: Re: [WinMac] ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup
>
>
>
>> "Robert W. James Jr" wrote:
>>
>> But for those of us not on the Retrospect List, it would be
>> appreciated if replies to Tom's query would be posted to this list.
>> And Tom, if you post this query to the Retrospect List, could you
>> forward any answers you get to me or others on this list, if it's not
>> too much trouble? I'm not sure I want to sub to another listserv just
>> yet. Thanks.
>
>
>I decided to subscribe to the Retrospect list since I already use it to
>backup my Macs. After reading comments from searching Dejanews and
>comments from the Retrospect list I'm ready to ask my boss to PLEASE let
>me switch from ARCserve to Retrospect.
>
>I'll try to compile all of the messages into one so if you're interested
>you can read it if not just delete it as it will be long. I was
>surprised how much email this generated. There are a lot of folks out
>there who have switched and are very pleased with Retrospect Server Backup.
>
>--
> Tom Roth • tomroth@wfubmc.edu • tel 336.716.4493
> Wake Forest University School of Medicine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue May 01 2001 - 11:20:08 PDT
|