Next message: jason: "RE: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?"
Hal,
I wasn't looking to start a Mac vs Windows war... In fact, it would be nice
if Apple had a platform to run OS-X on like the now-dead Apple Network
Server 500 & 700.
To put it another way, would YOU run your mission critical Internet
services (mail, WWW) on a G4 workstation? An iMac?!
Cheers!
Dan
PS: Win2k/AS (Advanced Server) supports basic "shared nothing" clustering.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: winmac-errors@lists.best.com
> [mailto:winmac-errors@lists.best.com]On Behalf Of Hal Taylor
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 7:05 PM
> To: winmac@lists.best.com
> Subject: Re: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?
>
>
> Ouch, Dan.
>
> It looks like multiprocessor support is under works for OS X.
> Also, I'm not a UNIX guy, but doesn't BSD (the core on which OS X is
based) support
> clustering?
>
> Hal
>
> ----------
> >From: "Dan Schwartz" <Dan@BrakeAndGo.com>
> >To: winmac@lists.best.com
> >Subject: RE: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?
> >Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2000, 7:10 PM
> >
>
> >
> > One big difference is that you can run Win2k on *real* server
> hardware, as
> > opposed to single CPU workstation grade kit...
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Dan
*** Windows-MacintoshOS Cooperation List ***
FAQ: http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/
Archive: http://www.darryl.com/winmac/
To unsubscribe, send mail to winmac-request@lists.best.com
with just the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 17:35:42 PDT