Re: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?

From: Hal Taylor (haltaylor[at]mac.com)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 16:04:41 PDT

  • Next message: Dan Schwartz: "RE: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?"

    Ouch, Dan.

    It looks like multiprocessor support is under works for OS X. Also, I'm not
    a UNIX guy, but doesn't BSD (the core on which OS X is based) support
    clustering?

    Hal

    ----------
    >From: "Dan Schwartz" <Dan@BrakeAndGo.com>
    >To: winmac@lists.best.com
    >Subject: RE: [WinMac] OS X vs Win2000?
    >Date: Tue, Jul 4, 2000, 7:10 PM
    >

    >
    > One big difference is that you can run Win2k on *real* server hardware, as
    > opposed to single CPU workstation grade kit...
    >
    > Cheers!
    > Dan
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----

    >>
    >> Has anyone posted a comparison between OS X and Win2000 yet?
    >>
    >> Robert L. Pritchett

    *** Windows-MacintoshOS Cooperation List ***
    FAQ: http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/
    Archive: http://www.darryl.com/winmac/

    To unsubscribe, send mail to winmac-request@lists.best.com
    with just the word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 05 2000 - 16:29:01 PDT