Re: [WinMac] Basic server information
Richard Laycock(rlaycock[at]earthlink.net)
> >My questions, is NT the way to go? How expert do you have to be to maintain >this/set it up or will we have to buy this expertise in? or training? Would >a Mac server be a realistic alternative? Can it do the job i describe? If >the server is NT should we start replacing the Mac's with PC's? We are >moving towards more of the graphics/illustration work being done by >suppliers so other than the need to be able to import their work from MAC's >to PC's and the mac user preferences i'm not sure we really need two >platforms. > > >look forward to your comments > >david dobedoe >david@dobedoe.demon.co.uk >http://www.dobedoe.demon.co.uk >
Greeting David,
I run a small (26 station) LAN of mainly PCs and a couple Macs. We're
I'm very impressed. It's got lots of features; database server (Oracle,
Prosoft is doing the Mac client for Novell. They have a beta (works very
Besides my own research on NT since I run a Wingate proxy on our network I
That's too risky. NT5 is now at 35 million lines of code. Netware is 8 - 10
My advice would be to go Big Red.
Richard L.
Richard Laycock
El Cajon, CA
--=----------next-message-----------=
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Sun Dec 20 1998 - 15:58:59 PST |