Re: [WinMac] Re: Office version terminology question

Doug Clements(doug_clements[at]eee.org)
Tue, 1 Sep 1998 06:58:58 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Todd Kennedy: "[WinMac] Re: All In One Macintosh Device"
Previous message: Jim Royal: "RE: [WinMac] Video Formats"
Maybe in reply to: Carnes, Michael: "[WinMac] Video Formats"
Next in thread: Curtis Wilcox: "Re: [WinMac] Re: Office version terminology question"

A few weeks ago, we had to set up some machines for Windows for Workgroups.
It was kind of funny to see Pentium II 333s with 64 megs of RAM booting
DOS, then Windows. It was nearly instantaneous :)

--Doug

>
>As for wondering if anyone still uses the old versions, YES. Lots of
>people are even still on Windows 3.1 and use Office 4.x on 386, 486
>computers. And many are on Office 95 as well. Not everyone can afford
>outlandish upgrade prices, even as a business expense. There's even a
>whole lot of people on DOS.
>
>Jeff T
>thorstadj@macconnect.com

* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
* FAQ: <http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/> *
* Archives: <http://www.darryl.com/winmac/> *
* Subscribe: <mailto:winmac-on@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Subscribe Digest: <mailto:winmac-digest@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Unsubscribe: <mailto:winmac-off@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *

Next message: Todd Kennedy: "[WinMac] Re: All In One Macintosh Device"
Previous message: Jim Royal: "RE: [WinMac] Video Formats"
Maybe in reply to: Carnes, Michael: "[WinMac] Video Formats"
Next in thread: Curtis Wilcox: "Re: [WinMac] Re: Office version terminology question"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Tue Sep 01 1998 - 07:02:59 PDT