Re: [WinMac] Re: DAVE & TCP/IP vs SFM
Michael Bartosh(bartosh[at]tamu.edu)
> Michael Kulyk @ MACSPECTRUM wrote: >> >> I did some testing at a client where we installed DAVE. They can >> create PostScript files on >> the server about 2.5 times faster using DAVE and TCP/IP to mount >> the server volume as opposed to >> AppleTalk/AppleShare and SFM. >> >> Let us not be too harsh on sysadmins. >> Remeber, >> 1. they never get a date >> 2. they still love Kirk from the original Star Trek >> 3. they consider burritos a food group > > Hey, first, my wife would object to the date thing, second, maybe not > Kirk...but Yeoman Rand?? Ooo la-la! And whattya mean burritos aren't a food > group!!! They're right here on my chart, next to beer! ;-P > > Finally, with luck, NT5, if it ever comes out, will address that problem by > incorporating ASIP. AppleTalk was really never meant to be anything but a > small workgroup protocol...the wonder isn't that it doesn';t work so well in > enterprise networks, but that it does work. There has NEVER been an easier > network to set up...Win/netbeui comes close, but it's still not so well > integrated into the OS. IMO.
Netatalk is entirely supirior in ease of setup. The conf file is
Pretty cool.
-mab
>
*******
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
- -- Nietzsche
* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Mar 08 1999 - 07:40:43 PST |