Re: [WinMac] RE: Cost/functionality analysis

MoFoMotz@aol.com
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:02:58 EST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Dan Schwartz: "[WinMac] Merced shortcomings"
• Previous message: CHoogendyk@aol.com: "Re: [WinMac] RE: Cost/functionality analysis"
• Maybe in reply to: thomas kase: "[WinMac] RE: Cost/functionality analysis"

<< one of the most
important things I learned was to treat everyone with respect >>

This is so true, along with everything else you said. I have been a labor
relations and employment attorney representing employers for 22 years, if
employers treat their employees with respect, they do not experience as many
productivity debilitating disruptions or get sued nearly as often as those
employers whose managers ignore this principle.

Norman Mott
Shields Mott Lund L.L.P.
New Orleans

* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
* FAQ: <http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/> *
* Archives: <http://www.darryl.com/winmac/> *
* Subscribe: <mailto:winmac-on@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Subscribe Digest: <mailto:winmac-digest@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Unsubscribe: <mailto:winmac-off@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *

• Next message: Dan Schwartz: "[WinMac] Merced shortcomings"
• Previous message: CHoogendyk@aol.com: "Re: [WinMac] RE: Cost/functionality analysis"
• Maybe in reply to: thomas kase: "[WinMac] RE: Cost/functionality analysis"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Sat Jan 16 1999 - 09:05:45 PST