Re: [WinMac] Re: Graphic production, which is the better platform?

Dan Schwartz(expresso[at]snip.net)
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:54:28 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Marc Bizer: "[WinMac] back to our regular discussion"
Previous message: Dan Schwartz: "[WinMac] Re: macs without Appletalk"
In reply to: Alex Dearden: "[WinMac] Re: macs without Appletalk"

At 10:23 PM 1/11/99 -0500, Alex wrote:
>>Graphic production, which is the better platform?
>
>Hmmm... without getting into flame wars, I would say that a big thing for
>artists is ease of use. Here the Mac exels. On the Mac you can open
>virtually any graphic file that you get without having to rename it (this
>is one of the things I find most disturbing about any Windows platform:
>you change the extensions of your file or forget to put one in and good
>luck trying to open it!).

Unless the Resource Fork gets corrupted... :(

* Windows-MacOS Cooperation List *
* FAQ: <http://www.darryl.com/winmacfaq/> *
* Archives: <http://www.darryl.com/winmac/> *
* Subscribe: <mailto:winmac-on@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Subscribe Digest: <mailto:winmac-digest@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *
* Unsubscribe: <mailto:winmac-off@xerxes.frit.utexas.edu> *

Next message: Marc Bizer: "[WinMac] back to our regular discussion"
Previous message: Dan Schwartz: "[WinMac] Re: macs without Appletalk"
In reply to: Alex Dearden: "[WinMac] Re: macs without Appletalk"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Mon Jan 11 1999 - 20:04:57 PST